DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE RO SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO8&397-14
19 November 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
sub): es Ey
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 812/0344 of
4 Nov 2014
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed
enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced
to B-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination.
2. The Board, consisting of
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner‘’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION ©
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
matter.
Docket No.NRO8397-14
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012
Navy-wide advancement examination with an effective date of 16 June
2013 and a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2013.
b. Petitioner's September 2012 profile will be corrected to
reflect Group 1 vice Group 3.
c. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances from the
effective date forward.
d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c}) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
#
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6{e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{e)) and having assured.
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference’
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
19 November 2014
. ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3533 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3533-14 8 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: A a Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. The Board determined the following factors militated in favor of relief: That Petitioner did pass the PFA before the limiting date, as required, that the CO endorsed Petitioner's selection for advancement by “frocking” him...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4169-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3893 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to 5 advanced to B-5/MM2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement | evele. Navy Personnel Command is directed to issue Petitioner a DD Form 215 to correct his effective date of rank and pay. 7, Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4193 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00938-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/MM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, ‘Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2740 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07581-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...